Saturday, 29. November 2014
08. 05. 14. - 17:00
By Andreas Unterberger
To date Austrian trade unions have organised two demonstrations outside the Plachutta restaurant chain. It is certainly something that should be cause for concern.
Mario Plachutta is a restaurant chain owner with a growing business and a number of locations, and like almost any other restaurant owner is also regularly a victim of theft. The immediate dismissal of the Slovakian over the theft of a half a kilo of sugar is certainly something that can be traced back to frustration over this situation. The fact that Plachutta personally managed to catch somebody himself while at the same time hundreds of others went unnoticed was also probably a factor in his swift reaction. And of course the fact that he has a somewhat choleric temperament.
And of course, as is to be expected, the waiter challenged the decision in an industrial tribunal, which is something that you would expect in a democracy (even if that is separate from the fact that the industrial tribunals almost certainly find in favour of the employee). But leaving that aside, the fact is that the courts are there in order for a decision to be made about such situations.
What then can be the motive of the trade union officials after winning at court then go on to organise demonstrations? Do they want to show that the Arbeiterkammer&Co (Chamber of Commerce) is indeed good for something? It should be pointed out at this point that the waiter could have gone to the industrial tribunal without them. Was it perhaps to cover up the fact that the Chamber of Commerce elections were almost completely ignored? Or was it perhaps simply that the restaurant is in a nice location and offers a great photo opportunity? Could it even be Plachutta's once family connection with a Freedom Party politician? (In 1999 Heinz-Christian Strache married Daniela Plachutta, the daughter of Ewald Plachutta).
At the end of the day the reason is irrelevant. What is significant is when anybody, whether that is trade unionists or anti-fur trade opponents, decides to stage demonstrations directly in front of companies in a way that restricts their business activities. (Example in February 2000 flats belonging to ministers were blockaded for days (in opposition to the freedom party coalition government).
With activities like this the right to a demonstration is changed and becomes the right to threaten and to damage the business.
But this connection in our constitution here in Austria in contrast to other Western countries is treated far too one-sidedly. That's because the constantly to be defended right to have an opinion should not be so easily translated into threats, barricades and blackmail. But despite that, this is widely practised by the left.
What is also problematic is something that the Green party are doing ever more consistently – blockading streets for hours at a time even on busy roads like the city centre Ring Road. And that's simply for the fact that a few dozen of them have managed to sit on bikes or walk in the way of traffic. These people have the protection of the Constitution, even if there is only a handful of them causing massive disruptions to everybody else. Even if the carbon dioxide footprint of all that stationary traffic is enormous, because the drivers can't get to where they want to go, and have to sit with engines idling.
And while freedom of opinion is something that is worth fighting for, the more the focus is on this, the less the understanding seems to be when the right to demonstration is increasingly used as a way of breaking down opposition and winning the majority around to a different way of thinking. When that happens then this threatens the right to demonstrations in itself. Or should we allow people who are against cyclists being allowed on the ring or people who are critical of waiters who steal from their employer?
Perhaps it's okay to end up with a situation here, like the one we have in the Ukraine?
That at the end of the day is why we have courts, that is why we have numerous channels were we can give our opinion, that is why we have different people in our democracy with the right to different opinions. But we don't have the right to use aggression – not yet at least.
- See more at: http://www.andreas-unterberger.at/2014/05/plachutta-die-demonstrationen-und-die-meinungsfreiheit/#sthash.mT2v0rwJ.dpuf
Panda Dies Of Horrific Injuries After Savage Attack
A three-year-old wild Giant Panda left badly wounded in the Tangjiahe National Nature Reserve in China after an attack by yellow-throated martens has died of its wounds.
Food Jewellery Craze In Japan
The designers call it modern art, and claim it is designed for the woman who wants a guarantee she will stand out at the next dinner party.
Darth Vader Taken Out By Street Sign
Darth Vader and a pair of Imperial Stormtroopers felt the force of a blow from a road sign after not paying attention while hitting the campaign trail.
How An Austrian Park Every Year Becomes A Lake
Spectacular images that show how a park becomes a lake each spring complete with underwater trees have been captured by two divers.
Mad About Mammoths At Vienna Museum
A unique exhibition in the Austrian capital Vienna has proved a massive hit after bringing together for the first time some of the most famous frozen woolly mammoth remains.
Controversy Over Advert For Fucking Hell Beer
An Austrian political party has defended a decision to promote a local beer named after the village of Fucking.
Luigi Restaurant Cooks Up Delicious Delights For Winter Season
Brothers Luigi and Leo Doci who own the renowned Luigi restaurant chain will be cooking up a storm in Semmering this winter.
Church Porn Star In Court
A Polish-born woman who made a video of herself masturbating in church is facing six months in jail after a viewer called police when he recognised the woman.
Hugh Grant Cuddles Lamb On Animal Farm With Mrs Glock
Hugh Grant led a star-studded turnout at Austria's animal farm project which unveiled its Christmas market this week.
Cheating Wife Buries Hubby Alive For New Lover
A woman who married her sisterís fiance and then attacked him with a knife before burying him alive so she could be with her new lover is facing life in jail.
The most popular stories –
last 7 days
|Chicken Farmer Jailed For Hacking Off Lovers Head And Fingers|
|How An Austrian Park Every Year Becomes A Lake|
|Orphanage Staff Say They Hit Kids So Hard It Tired Them Out|
|Outrage Over Slapping Of Baby Panda|
|Stag Do Brit Had Taken Cocaine Admit Family|
Why suffer in silence. Let off steam by letting our readers share your troubles. File your complaints about anything and everything here.
Our ombudsman David Rogers will try and help solve some of the problems from lazy civil servants through to incompetent companies – and at the very least the worst transgressors will end up in our weekly special report.